@FairlyRandom responds from 1 (min) up to N (max).
I start N at 50, and ask for a random integer up to N. If the answer is prime (1 is not prime or composite) then this market resolves Yes, otherwise in a day or so then it'll resolve No.
If anyone objects to N because they don't like its properties as a number and articulates this with reasoning in the comments, then I'll add one to N and ask @FairlyRandom again, prolonging my resolution date another day and potentially changing the resolution depending on primality. This continues until there are no objections, or we reach the end of 2026.
1,000People are also trading
I can't use the same reason, can I? (The reason being "it's unfair")
@AlanTennant your random number is: 48
Salt: l1omr4ggc1, round: 5922285 (signature aefba0a65e3b5d0ebb964dd663fb60c27d403d2ef6014dcab83b18f762d93d3b5c98cced353cadf8109f4e2eca7d26b9081846aacba14df3c61fe82d18f48a085a2a309b459fce75572d6e9c146896b3677fe1010b472c7ea7f2a01570523d2c)
@AlanTennant you asked for a random integer between 1 and 51, inclusive. Coming up shortly!
Source: GitHub, previous round: 5922283 (latest), offset: 2, selected round: 5922285, salt: l1omr4ggc1.
I’ll bite. I object to N=50 because (assuming each number is equally likely to be chosen), you are 2.3 times more likely to choose a composite number than a prime number
The first to object to N with a reason also gets 20 free mana from me. 🪙
@AlanTennant your random number is: 44
Salt: 0zgur7sjccsc, round: 5920794 (signature 98f7786d735a894939d318f19451e1225447814cc1836f9879879348985aeb43f81fe06173cfe545bdcd4595b2b1bd7d0ec79da91a6b42320d3920969159ad9859e655bb8adfb9c6bba02e590463913144f7055aaf93a20731880471c713cbd2)
@AlanTennant you asked for a random integer between 1 and 50, inclusive. Coming up shortly!
Source: GitHub, previous round: 5920792 (latest), offset: 2, selected round: 5920794, salt: 0zgur7sjccsc.